JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 27, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Carlos Eduardo Duque Romero Vs. Fiduciaria De Occidente S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Veintinueve Penal Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Juzgado Decimo Penal Municipal De Bogota. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Decimo Penal Municipal De Bogota
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Discrepancia sobre la naturaleza jurídica de la entidad demandada
Providencias De La Corte Constitucional
  • Tendría efectos inter pares donde se inaplique Decreto 1382 de 2000
Accion De Tutela Contra Fiduciaria De Occidente
  • Competencia de Juez Penal Municipal de Bogotá
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir al Juzgado 10deg Penal Municipal de Bogota, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida mediante apoderado por el senor Carlos Eduardo Duque Romero contra la Fiduciaria de Occidente S.A., para que se tramite y decida sin mas dilacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.